Book a demo
Login
A digital twin is a dynamic, virtual representation of a physical asset, system, process, or facility that reflects information about its real-world counterpart. By connecting engineering data, equipment specifications, sensor data, maintenance history, inspection records, and operational information, a digital twin enables organisations to monitor, analyse, simulate, and optimise assets throughout their lifecycle.
In oil and gas, energy, chemicals, utilities, manufacturing, pharmaceuticals, shipping, and mining, digital twin technology can provide engineers and operators with a connected view of complex physical assets and the information required to understand them.
A digital twin is more than a 3D model or CAD representation. Its value comes from the connection between the digital representation and the physical asset — and from the quality, structure, and context of the underlying data.
A digital twin works by connecting a digital representation with data from the physical asset and the systems used to manage it.
Depending on the application, data can come from IoT sensors capturing operational parameters, engineering systems containing specifications and documentation, maintenance systems recording inspections and work history, and operational systems containing production and performance information.
A practical industrial digital twin can be understood as three connected layers:
For industrial assets, the data layer is fundamental. Without a reliable Master Tag Register, structured asset hierarchy, and governed Asset Information Management foundation, information from different systems can be difficult to connect reliably.
This three-layer architecture was already one of the strongest parts of the existing Sharecat content.
Digital twins can operate at different levels of scope and complexity:
The appropriate type depends on the use case. Not every organisation needs a comprehensive facility twin; significant value can also come from connecting information around individual critical assets or systems.
These four levels also preserve the useful classification already present in Sharecat's original page.
A digital twin and a 3D model are not the same thing.
A 3D model primarily represents the geometry and physical arrangement of an asset. A digital twin connects a digital representation to information about the real asset, such as its identity, specifications, configuration, condition, documentation, maintenance history, and potentially its current operating state.
A 3D model can be an important visualisation layer within a digital twin, but it is not necessarily a prerequisite.
For example, a maintenance-focused asset twin can create value by connecting equipment tags, condition information, maintenance history, technical specifications, and documentation without requiring an advanced 3D environment.
A simulation models how a system may behave under a defined set of assumptions or scenarios. A digital twin represents an identifiable real-world asset or system and is connected to information about that physical counterpart.
Simulation can therefore be one capability within a digital twin. Combining asset information and operating data with simulation models allows teams to compare actual and expected behaviour and investigate potential future scenarios.
As simulation platforms become more connected to operational data, the distinction can become less clear. The important characteristic of a digital twin is the persistent relationship between the digital representation and the physical asset it represents.
The original Sharecat page already addressed this distinction, which is worth retaining because it helps clarify a common source of confusion.
Common industrial digital twin use cases include:
These were already among the strongest industrial elements of the existing Sharecat content.
A digital twin is rarely used by only one team.
In asset-intensive industries, different disciplines can use the same connected information for different purposes:
The usefulness of the twin across all these disciplines depends on whether they are referring to the same assets, identifiers, documents, and underlying information.
The exact requirements depend on the application, but an industrial digital twin commonly needs:
This is where data contextualization becomes important.
A pressure reading has limited meaning without knowing which instrument produced it. A vendor datasheet has limited operational value if it cannot be connected to the equipment it describes. An inspection record becomes more useful when it is connected to the correct tag, equipment history, location, and documentation.
Contextualization provides these relationships.
Digital twin technology cannot automatically correct unreliable source information.
If equipment has different identifiers across engineering, maintenance, and operational systems, connecting information to the correct physical asset becomes difficult. If technical specifications are incomplete or outdated, the digital representation may not accurately describe installed equipment. If documentation is disconnected from tags, engineers may still need to reconcile records manually.
Typical digital twin data problems include:
These are information-management problems rather than visualisation problems.
For this reason, digital twin initiatives are closely connected to data quality management, Asset Information Management, and master data governance.
The original Sharecat page already identified these specific data-quality failure modes; the main change here is removing the unsupported claim that a particular percentage of digital twin projects fail because of them.
Before implementing an industrial digital twin, organisations typically need several information foundations in place:
These prerequisites were already explicitly covered in the existing Sharecat content.
Digital twin capability does not have to appear all at once. Organisations can progress from relatively simple connected asset information toward increasingly sophisticated applications.
A practical maturity progression can include:
Stage 1 — Descriptive twin:
A digital representation based primarily on engineering data, documentation, and asset configuration.
Stage 2 — Informative twin:
Maintenance, inspection, and other operational information is connected to the asset model, providing a richer historical and current view.
Stage 3 — Predictive twin:
Sensor data and analytics are added to support condition monitoring and prediction.
Stage 4 — Comprehensive twin:
Multiple assets, systems, processes, and source systems are integrated into a broader facility-level representation with simulation and analytics capabilities.
Stage 5 — Autonomous twin:
Advanced analytics and automation enable the system to recommend or potentially execute defined operational actions.
The important principle is that more advanced digital twin capabilities require increasingly reliable data and system integration underneath them.
I would keep this section because the five-stage model is one of the more differentiated pieces of the original Sharecat page.
The data foundation for an industrial digital twin often starts long before the asset enters operations.
During engineering, procurement, construction, and commissioning, organisations create equipment identifiers, specifications, supplier information, engineering documents, asset relationships, and other information that the future digital twin may depend on.
At project completion, this information must move from the project environment into the systems used by the owner-operator.
If those relationships are lost during document and data handover, operations may receive the individual records and documents without the context needed to connect them reliably to the physical facility.
Establishing these relationships during project execution creates a stronger foundation not only for digital twins, but also for EAM, CMMS, analytics, and other operational applications.
Sharecat focuses on the structured, governed engineering and asset information that industrial digital twin applications depend on.
By connecting tags, equipment attributes, engineering documentation, supplier information, and asset relationships, Sharecat helps establish a reliable information foundation before that data is consumed by digital twin and operational platforms.
This is particularly important during capital project execution and project handover, when engineering information transitions into the operational environment.
Sharecat's alignment with ISO 15926 and CFIHOS further supports consistent information structures and interoperability between engineering, asset management, and digital applications.
The goal is not to replace digital twin technology. It is to help ensure that the information feeding the twin remains structured, contextualised, traceable, and connected to the correct physical assets.
What is a digital twin in simple terms?
A digital twin is a digital representation of a real physical asset, system, process, or facility connected to information about its real-world counterpart.
How does a digital twin work?
A digital twin connects a digital representation with information from the physical asset and its supporting systems. This can include engineering data, documents, maintenance and inspection history, operational information, IoT sensors, and other data sources.
What is the difference between a digital twin and a 3D model?
A 3D model primarily represents geometry. A digital twin connects the representation to information about the actual asset, such as identity, specifications, condition, documentation, maintenance history, and potentially live operating data.
Do you need a 3D model for a digital twin?
No. A 3D model can be a useful visualisation layer, but many digital twin applications can provide value through connected asset, maintenance, engineering, inspection, and operational information without advanced 3D visualisation.
What is the difference between a digital twin and IoT?
IoT refers to connected sensors and devices that collect and exchange data. IoT can provide real-time information to a digital twin, but a digital twin can also combine engineering information, documentation, maintenance history, inspection records, and other information that does not originate from IoT devices.
Is a digital twin the same as a simulation?
No. A simulation models how a system could behave under defined conditions. A digital twin represents a specific real-world asset or system and is connected to information about that physical counterpart. Simulation can be one capability within a digital twin.
What data does a digital twin need?
An industrial digital twin typically needs reliable asset identifiers, equipment attributes, hierarchy information, engineering documentation, and relationships between records. Maintenance, inspection, operational, and sensor information can then be added according to the use case.
How is a digital twin kept up to date?
The information behind the twin must be updated as the physical asset changes. This requires governed change control, integration with relevant source systems, and ongoing validation of asset information.
What are the benefits of digital twins?
Depending on the application, digital twins can support maintenance, inspection, remote engineering, asset modifications, operational analysis, simulation, performance optimisation, and improved access to connected asset information.
ISO
27001
Certified
